





The policy also raises the issue of whether the government should be in a position to legitimize a media organization or reporter, Randall said.
"The government shouldn't be controlling the media," he said. "What it gives, it can take away."
Yikes!! I would not want to be in that position either! This reminds me of "the war on Fox News". Who defines news? And should the government be in a position to define it or legitimize it?? No, thank you! What a sticky situation.
Obviously, with the growth of the Internet, rules and regulations regarding media must be changed. But maybe the whole view on media needs to change first. Why is the White House speaking out against a news channel simply because the channel is holding government officials accountable? Why is a blogger excluded from an executive session, when he or she is trying to get important information to his or her readers? Isn't it better to allow many voices into a debate? I believe the attitude toward media as a whole is going to shift in the upcoming years. More and more people become bloggers every day, and the elite and exclusionary group of media producers just won't be able to stay the same.
Disclaimer: Hope I am not offending anyone by including my political analysis in my blog posts. I find it easier and more fun to post if I am worked up about something. Obviously, you have the right to disagree. These are just my thoughts! :)