Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Rocky Mountains will have journalism!

When the Rocky Mountain News closed earlier this year, I have to admit, I'd never heard of it. Someone from Colorado brought it up in my politics class, and I soon realized that the closure was a pretty big deal.

This Denver news site has an article published yesterday about Colorado Public News, a new news website for the area. The site is in the process of raising money, so the link sends you to a "beta version" for now.

The site contains a note to visitors:
We are just getting started. Like public television, we are raising funds from the community to support our project. Once we have hit our goal, we will publish every week.


...So what's the big deal?
The big deal is -- their approach.

"The concept: Instead of going it alone, CPN has formed a nonprofit partnership with Channel 12, an adventurous public-television station."

This is an attempt to secure enough revenue to be able to produce investigative journalism. The model was inspired a lot by Voice of San Diego. So what are the perks?
  • Channel 12 would commit to providing approximately a quarter of CPN's annual budget, currently set at $2.2 million.
  • The station would also broadcast a regular, thirty-minute CPN show that would both promote the website and presumably legitimize it in the minds of possible donor organizations and individuals.
Sounds pretty sweet to me!
This model seems exactly like what the area needs. People want a credible news source that is hip to technology, and CPN is going to fill that want. Recruiting well-known professionals for the staff can't hurt either. The people, business model and attitude of this organization are what new media is all about.

"We're asking people to get involved in the creation of this product -- to call us, e-mail us, comment on the stories," she says. "It's the first step in trying to use social media to develop the journalism that's on the site as well."

@ariannahuff comes to IC!

So, Arianna Huffington was pretty late... but it was cool to see her :)

Highlights:

Her ideas on why Dan Froomkin is so popular; he engages readers and wants citizens to be involved. I think we need to keep hearing this over and over again, until we realize that that is how you keep readers in this "new technology era". I also liked how she explained "comment moderators" on Huffington Post; she really knows her stuff with new media!

Her thoughts that "not every story has two sides." She said we should be pursuing truth, and that sometimes there aren't two equal sides. Since coming to IC I've heard a lot about this argument, but I'm still undecided. I guess I still have hopes for objectivity and showing every side, and this argument just doesn't sit well with me.

Arianna mentioning IC on her twitter!!! :)

She was really pushing having a specialization, something that you care about- and she referenced the movie Julie & Julia. The moment that movie came onto the screen when I was watching it in theaters, I knew I was going to LOVE it. Every journalism student should see it. It really reminds you that writing can be fun, and it can affect people more than you think. And it shows that blogging can be frustrating, but sometimes it can lead to amazing results. We're not all into politics, but we do all have hobbies and interests we can write about.

I'm pretty sure this is the real blog: The Julie/Julia Project